Subscribe | Sponsors | About Us | Contact Us |
|||
|
|||
HOME |
JOURNAL | PAPERS | RESEARCH | FOCUS AREAS | SUPPLIERS | AWARDS | NEWS | EVENTS | |||
|
For more information...
The rise of the Internet has in turn spawned two forces which are driving companies to outsource. They are:
These two trends are forcing companies to conduct their business differently and expanding the role that outsourcing and alliances play in today's highly competitive global economy. In my opinion, here are the reasons a company chooses to outsource today. Companies outsource for a combination of these reasons.
Change of Focus to the WebToday, the focus of outsourcing has changed as well. Ten years ago outsourcing vendors focused mainly on data centers and legacy applications. Today outsourcing zeroes in on the Internet. In the past companies outsourced to get rid of assets; today more and more companies outsource to gain capabilities. Total outsourcing was the norm in the past; today selective outsourcing is more common. Traditional outsourcing centered around IT only. Today, the trend is on business process outsourcing (BPO) and application service providers(ASP) In my opinion, the ASPs have ushered in a new era in outsourcing. Now companies of all sizes can gain access to outsourcing capability, capacity and coverage . New vehicles like the OutsourcingCenter's Exchange allow anyone to get assistance with contextual processes through outsourcing, while making it possible for small and medium companies to also gain the advantages of outsourcing. The new economy is changing the role of the senior IT executive. Today the CIO should not be managing day-to-day operations. Smart companies are outsourcing that and freeing the CIO to become a corporate leader and contribute to the firm's business strategy. The CIO now has time to focus on two-way alignment of IT and the business strategy by spending less time on tactical management of IT resources. The CIO today is truly "Free to Lead" like at no other time in history. Even the mood of outsourcing has changed, altered by the pressures of global competition. In the past outsourcing negotiations tended to be more win-lose and adversarial. The buyer negotiated tough to get the cheapest price possible while the supplier wanted to have little or no accountability or liability. Today we see more examples of both sides recognizing that they need each other and that the long-term quality of the relationship is critical. Realizing that a negative approach is not the way to build a good relationship, both parties see the need to craft a win-win relationship. Buyers have matured, realizing outsourcing is an important component of their business strategy. Service providers have matured, realizing that happy customers mean more business and good references. Slashed Cycle TimesThe Internet has cut cycle times. This has created an investment paradox. In the past the business cycle changed every 10 years. The technology cycle changed every five to seven years. Today the business cycle changes every 12 to 24 months, and the technology cycle ranges from one to three years. This compression has created a tremendous tension. Firms are in a quandary, trying to keep up and compete. Thus, companies are seeing that the assets that enabled in the past may inhibit now. New and emerging companies, for example, are not owning their own resources; they are not creating their own IT infrastructure or large accounting, finance, human resources and other non-core departments. Instead, these emerging companies are turning to outsourcing and alliances. The result: increased agility and flexibility. Lessons from the Outsourcing Primer:
Publish Date: November 2000
For more information... Copyright © 2000 - Everest Partners, L.P. |
SPONSORS |
|||
|
|
||||